In the economics of B2B travel, inefficiency rarely appears on the balance sheet as a single line item. Yet across the industry, it quietly consumes millions. Virtual card fees strip out 2–4% per transaction. Settlement delays often stretch 10–14 days, locking up liquidity when suppliers need it most. And with OTAs and bedbanks earning net margins of just 3–5%, even a 1% swing in foreign exchange can wipe out profit on entire contracts.
This is not a peripheral issue. Payments are the bloodstream of the travel economy. And right now, that bloodstream is clogged.
Liquidity determines more than working capital. In India, where SMEs drive a large share of hotel supply, delayed settlement means operators scale back inventory during peak seasons. In Nigeria and Kenya, wallet-first suppliers now demand same-day payouts as a condition for partnerships. In Mexico, peso volatility magnifies FX exposure to the point that intermediaries lose 100–200 basis points per transaction if they rely on card-based rails.
Trust is not built in glossy contracts. It is built in the timing and transparency of payments. When a supplier waits two weeks for funds, the relationship strains. When they are paid in hours, trust compounds.
Virtual cards promised safety and reconciliation. But in practice they have become a tax on growth. Every transaction carries 2–4% in total costs, and the promise of instant flexibility rarely translates to instant liquidity. Suppliers in Southeast Asia increasingly reject them, forcing operators to patch together alternative rails.
In a market already running on thin margins: often 3–5% net in OTA contracts losing 2% on payments is not sustainable.
The fragility of today’s payment system is most obvious in emerging markets — which also happen to be the fastest-growing corridors for travel demand.
These are not side stories. They are the front lines of the industry’s growth.
The answer is not to make old pipes flow slightly faster, but to design new ones entirely. The industry has long treated payments as plumbing — hidden infrastructure best left untouched. That mindset is no longer tenable. Payments must be understood as a platform in themselves, the foundation on which efficiency, trust, and scale depend.
An OTA cannot expand into new markets if it cannot settle quickly with suppliers. A bedbank cannot negotiate stronger contracts if its partners distrust the timing of funds. A hotel chain cannot optimise distribution if its liquidity is tied up in 14-day cycles.
Payments are no longer a cost centre. They are strategic infrastructure.
PayDocker is designed to replace fragmentation with clarity:
For demand partners, this reduces exposure to FX and margin leakage. For suppliers, it restores trust by paying faster and more predictably. For the industry, it creates the borderless infrastructure it has long lacked. A mid-sized OTA paying $50M annually to suppliers can redirect just 40% of its VCC volume to PayDocker’s rails and realise savings of over $220,000 a year before even counting the trust gained from faster supplier payouts.
The industry must now ask itself: do we continue carrying structural inefficiencies into the next cycle, or do we finally treat payments as infrastructure, not overhead?
The first option is comfortable, familiar, and costly. The second is transformative, overdue, and unavoidable.
The travel industry has spent decades innovating at the surface: sleeker apps, sharper booking engines, better user experience. But it has neglected the foundations.
Infrastructure determines destiny. The companies that will define the next decade of travel will not simply move people more efficiently. They will move money better.
PayDocker is building those pipes.
And in that race, PayDocker is not simply participating. It is setting the standard.